Richard Dawkins' chatbot isn't conscious - it's just all talk. My take on the Dawkins/Claude kerfuffle in The Nerve
Scientist, Author, Speaker
The science of consciousness
Understanding the biological basis of conscious experience is one of the great challenges for 21st Century Science. Check out my essay The Mythology of Conscious AI, which won the 2025 Berggruen Prize Essay Competition and my new main-stage TED talk.
A 2021 Book of the Year (New Statesman, Economist, Bloomberg, Five Books), a 2021 Science Book of the Year (Guardian, Financial Times). Being You is out now in hardback, paperback, ebook, and audio.
Interviews and conversations.
Academic and public engagement projects.
What’s coming up and what’s happened.
Consciousness at TED
Your brain hallucinates your conscious reality
My main-stage TED talk has more than 15 million views.
TED Talk 2026
Why AI is unlikely to become conscious
I won the 2025 Berggruen Prize Essay Competition for "The Mythology of Conscious AI" - read it now in Noema.
The call for commentary proposals for my new paper 'Conscious artificial intelligence and biological naturalism' is now open at BBS. Deadline is June 12th.
"Inside the big bet on consciousness". My take on the adversarial collaboration between two consciousness theories, in Nautilus.
What gives meaning to life? I asked my Mum .. in today's Guardian (along with 14 others)
"A science of consciousness beyond pseudo-science and pseudo-consciousness" Our comment (Àlex Gómez-Marin & me) on the IIT clash; out now in Nature Neuroscience.
I'm delighted to make the Clarivate 'Highly Cited' researcher list, for the fifth year running - along with 5 other Sussex academics:
fwiw I think the actual reason leaders of AI frontier labs suddenly seem to agree to pace AI development is
(a) safety measures are currently so crap that they're likely to end up in court if not jail, and they all agree that no one wants that
(b) they see no major new model
A thread about @MelMitchell1's (very informative) sbstk piece about "rogue" AI systems & how they should be described. Her target is language like: "a company loses control over rogue agents who escape from their cages, and become a swarm that schemes and colludes.."
As the supposed existential threats of AI dominate the news cycle, we risk losing focus on the clear and present real dangers of poorly designed and poorly deployed AI. Misleading metaphors hinder our ability to address these challenges, and they embed a sense of inevitability
@dwarkesh_sp's summary of the @OpenAI @huggingface incident has hit a nerve, but it is dangerously misleading. Sure, the @OpenAI agents did unexpectedly bad things - underlining the need to massively improve evaluation/sandboxing. But the language Dwarkesh uses is permeated by